Vote against DREAM act unfair and misunderstood

In a recent article dealing with the immigration related DREAM act, the entire process was outlined for what would be faced by anyone seeking citizenship in the United States. It seems that as usual, many have misunderstood the language of the act, and have voted unfairly against it in perpetuation of ideologies that need to be reviewed and revisited in favor of the overall desire that people be unified, rather than divided.

The current DREAM act states that children who were brought here by their parents, and who are currently either enlisting in the armed forces, or are students, be allowed to stay under certain strict guidelines only.

The students or soldiers would be allowed to remain in the country either to serve or attend college for two years under a ten year conditional non-immigrant, temporary, status. At the end of the ten year term, they would be eligible to apply for permanent residency, green card, status. And then, after some 13 odd years, would they be allowed to begin applying for naturalization; which can take years on top of that.

The general consensus is that these children would be a bridge somehow for their parents to gain access, or petition for citizenship on their behalf. This is sadly not the case, as any parent who was found to have unlawfully entered the United States would be barred from the US for ten additional years, while required to go back to their own country.

The laws in this area are strict and difficult to understand, and require the assistance of someone well versed in immigration law. If you are facing an immigration situation in the United States, contact an experienced immigration attorney immediately for help.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have questions about this posting or are interested in Criminal Defense, Divorce, or Immigration Law in RI contact Rhode Island Criminal Defense Lawyer John E. MacDonald at 401-421-1440.

To learn more about The Law Office of John MacDonald, please visit his website at AggressiveLegalServices.com.

Immigration Service Announces Reduces Visa Wait Times

RI Immigration Attorney John MacDonald suggests hiring a competent immigration attorney to assist you with your naturalization paperwork and process, but found the following article about Visa wait times encouraging for visitors to the United States who decide they would like to stay.

Visa wait times greatly reduced

Dec 08, 2010

The Immigration and Naturalization Service has just announced that legal U.S. immigrants will now have a shorter wait time if they plan to secure a Visa for a spouse or a child.

INS says for the past 5 years it has taken an average of 6 to 8 years for legal U.S. residents with green cards to be able to complete the process of securing a green card for family members.

Now the process can take as little as 8 to 10 months.

INS says part of the reason is that they have been receiving fewer applications, so the paperwork that is received can be processed faster.

Advances in technology have also helped INS become more efficient.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have questions about this posting or are interested in Criminal Defense, Divorce, or Immigration Law in RI contact Rhode Island Criminal Defense Lawyer John E. MacDonald at 401-421-1440.

To learn more about The Law Office of John MacDonald, please visit his website at AggressiveLegalServices.com.

Criminal Charges and Immigration Status

Criminal Charge and Immigration Status

One of the most common legal issues for those seeking permanent residency, or citizenship, is the effect of criminal charges on their immigration status. In many cases the effect of any conviction for a criminal charge will have serious and far reaching effects on immigration status, even if the crime was not a felony or violent crime.

Something as simple as a conviction for a DUI offense can have the effect of deportation or denial of admissibility or adjustment of status. If the offense is accompanied by a finding of violence or moral turpitude.

The guidelines for determining whether a judgment of guilt has occurred are much broader than under normal criminal law guidelines and can and do include situations where an offender enters a plea.

In some instances, the penalty for the crime may be significantly less than the immigration penalty. And if you have been convicted of a crime, make sure you are honest on any applications you fill out for entry into the US. If you are found guilty of fraud, you will not be granted entrance into the country.

In every case involving immigration matters, whether they involve a criminal element or not, it is in your best interest to seek the assistance and advice of an experienced immigration attorney.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have questions about this posting or are interested in Criminal Defense, Divorce, or Immigration Law in RI contact Rhode Island Criminal Defense Lawyer John E. MacDonald at 401-421-1440.

To learn more about The Law Office of John MacDonald, please visit his website at AggressiveLegalServices.com.

Immigration Issues Decided in Padilla v. Kentucky

Immigration Attorney John E. MacDonald Speaks on the Impact of the Supreme Court Ruling in Padilla v. Kentucky

On December 8, 2010, Attorney John E. MacDonald, Esquire spoke at the Rhode Island Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers’ annual Fall Continuing Legal Education Seminar regarding Developments in Criminal Law and Procedure. Attorney MacDonald presented an update relative to the recent Supreme Court Immigration ruling in Padilla v. Kentucky. The seminar encompassed effective strategies and tactics for providing effective assistance of counsel, and avoiding removal in criminal and immigration matters.

The case of Padilla v. Kentucky is a precedent setting Supreme Court case involving the rights of a criminal defendant to be informed regarding the possibility of deportation when entering into plea agreements, or being found guilty of all but the most minor criminal offenses. With the recent changes to the Immigration laws, private counsel is now in the position of having to inform criminal clients about the possibility of deportation in all but the most obscurely referenced Immigration laws. In all criminal cases involving immigrants, counsel must at least inform the client that the chance of deportation exists.

Attorney MacDonald is known for his experience in Criminal matters that also involve Immigration issues, and when asked about his engagement to speak at the CLE seminar dealing with this issue stated, “Padilla is a landmark decision from our Supreme Court. It places an affirmative duty on criminal defense lawyers to properly advise their clients as to the immigration consequences of a plea. Lawyers can no longer turn a blind eye to the harsh immigration consequences that may result from a plea to a criminal case.”

The CLE seminar took place on Wednesday December 8, 2010 from 4:00 to 7:00PM at the Frank Licht Judicial Complex, 250 Benefit Street, Providence, Rhode Island.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have questions about this posting or are interested in Criminal Defense, Divorce, or Immigration Law in RI contact Rhode Island Criminal Defense Lawyer John E. MacDonald at 401-421-1440.

To learn more about The Law Office of John MacDonald, please visit his website at AggressiveLegalServices.com.